Discussion:
Portland Oregon reservoir to be flushed because of urinating teen
(too old to reply)
Kike
2014-04-17 21:05:19 UTC
Permalink
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.

In June 2011, the city drained a 7.5 million-gallon reservoir at
Mount Tabor in southeast Portland after a man urinated in the
water supply. This time, water from a different reservoir at the
same location will be discarded after a 19-year-old was
videotaped in the act of urinating.

“The basic commandment of the Water Bureau is to provide clean,
cold and constant water to its customers,” bureau administrator
David Shaff said Wednesday. “And the premise behind that is we
don’t have pee in it.”

The open reservoirs hold water that has already been treated and
goes directly into mains for distribution to customers.

Portland Water Bureau spokeswoman Jaymee Cuti said Thursday that
test samples of water taken from the reservoir came back clean.

Shaff knew the urine posed little risk — animals routinely
deposit waste without creating a public health crisis — but said
the city has plenty of water to meet demand and he didn’t want
to serve water that was deliberately tainted.

“There is at least a perceived difference from my perspective,”
Shaff said. “I could be wrong on that, but the reality is our
customers don’t anticipate drinking water that’s been
contaminated by some yahoo who decided to pee into a reservoir.”

The discarded water will be drained into the sewage system,
eventually reaching a treatment plant before it’s dumped into
the Columbia River.

The incident occurred shortly after 1 a.m., when Water Bureau
security personnel noticed three men on camera at Mount Tabor
Reservoir No. 5. One was seen on video urinating through an iron
fence, officials said. Minutes later, two other young men
attempted to scale the fence.

The three men, whose names have not been released, were cited
for trespassing and excluded from Mount Tabor Park. A 19-year-
old was cited for public urination.

The Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office will decide
whether to pursue criminal charges.

The kidney-shaped reservoir built in 1911 is drained for
cleaning each spring and fall. The spring draining was done
about three weeks ago, the Water Bureau said.

The reservoir is one of five that the city is in the process of
replacing with underground storage to comply with federal
regulations.

Floy Jones, co-founder of the group Friends of the Reservoirs,
criticized the decision to drain the reservoir, saying there’s
no evidence any urine reached the water and it wouldn’t harm
anyone if it did.

“It’s extremely wasteful,” she said.

The man who urinated into Portland’s water supply in June 2011
eventually pleaded guilty to misuse of a reservoir and was
sentenced to community service.

Comments:

Juan Manuel Martinez
12:36 PM PDT
$3.441 per ccf = 2.17 gallons cost a penny (Portland water
bureau) at 38,000,000 gallons.

PP just bought $175,115.21 of H20

Hope for his sake that he suffers from Affluenza.

David Hollenshead
8:50 AM PDT
The problem with this reservoir is not the pee from a few
idiots, but rather duck poop and the occational dead duck, which
suggest that this open reaservoir is a very bad idea. But our
city is suffering from the debt from our incompitent, discraced,
man/boy lover, ex-Mayor Sam Adams, and is now struggling to pay
it's bills. (Yes and even our gay community asked this man to
resign when his love affair with a minor became public, on one
occation I had to shake his hand, yuckkkkk)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/energy-
environment/portland-plans-reservoir-flush-after-teen-
cited/2014/04/16/788e6530-c5cc-11e3-b708-471bae3cb10c_story.html
Wayne
2014-04-17 21:34:25 UTC
Permalink
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
In a related story, Portland will close all the parks and swimming pools on
a permanent basis.
RD Sandman
2014-04-17 21:43:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
In a related story, Portland will close all the parks and swimming
pools on a permanent basis.
Friend of mine in Florida has a sign on his "'ool. You will notice that
there is no "P" in it."
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Mr. B1ack
2014-04-18 06:31:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kike
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!

I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
Baxter
2014-04-18 13:56:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
Post by Kike
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.

Here's pix:
http://alturl.com/fd9sx
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
RogerGlover
2014-04-18 15:45:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.

#####

No birds either, you assume?
Fine.
I'll just shit-n-piss upstream, in the Bull Run River, like every other
animal does from now on... after I eat at Taco Bell.
Baxter
2014-04-18 16:17:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Mr. B1ack
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.
#####
No birds either, you assume?
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not inviting to
any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as much chorine.)
Post by Baxter
Fine.
I'll just shit-n-piss upstream, in the Bull Run River, like every other
animal does from now on... after I eat at Taco Bell.
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're not
allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.

http://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/29784
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
RD Sandman
2014-04-18 16:58:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:05:19 +0200 (CEST), "Kike"
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.
#####
No birds either, you assume?
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
Post by Baxter
Fine.
I'll just shit-n-piss upstream, in the Bull Run River, like every
other animal does from now on... after I eat at Taco Bell.
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
And just what keeps you and other furry animals out?
Post by Baxter
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/29784
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
RogerGlover
2014-04-18 20:22:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:05:19 +0200 (CEST), "Kike"
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.
#####
No birds either, you assume?
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
Post by Baxter
Fine.
I'll just shit-n-piss upstream, in the Bull Run River, like every
other animal does from now on... after I eat at Taco Bell.
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
And just what keeps you and other furry animals out?

####

baxter is funny! I think I will keep him.
RD Sandman
2014-04-18 20:38:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:05:19 +0200 (CEST), "Kike"
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated
water and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to
Portland officials who plan to flush away the whole lot —
the second time in less than three years the city has gone to such
lengths to keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.
#####
No birds either, you assume?
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
Post by Baxter
Fine.
I'll just shit-n-piss upstream, in the Bull Run River, like every
other animal does from now on... after I eat at Taco Bell.
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
And just what keeps you and other furry animals out?
####
baxter is funny! I think I will keep him.
Yes, but what makes it interesting is that it is unintentional. ;)
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
RogerGlover
2014-04-19 15:36:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:05:19 +0200 (CEST), "Kike"
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated
water and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to
Portland officials who plan to flush away the whole lot —
the second time in less than three years the city has gone to such
lengths to keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.
#####
No birds either, you assume?
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
Post by Baxter
Fine.
I'll just shit-n-piss upstream, in the Bull Run River, like every
other animal does from now on... after I eat at Taco Bell.
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
And just what keeps you and other furry animals out?
####
baxter is funny! I think I will keep him.
Yes, but what makes it interesting is that it is unintentional. ;)

###

Well, after watching "Gremlins", I know enough to never expose him to bright
light (especially sunlight, which will kill it); never get it wet; and, most
importantly: no matter how much it cries or begs, never, ever feed it after
midnight."
Just Wondering
2014-04-18 19:23:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're not
allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Baxter
2014-04-18 19:54:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.

Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know absolutely
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Just Wondering
2014-04-18 20:15:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know absolutely
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
True or false?
The reservoir is open to the air.
Answer: true.

True or false?
Birds can fly over the reservoir.
Answer: true.

True or false?
Birds can relieve themselves (pee and poop) in flight.
Answer: true.

True or false?
Birds can relieve themselves into the reservoir.
Answer: true.

True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the reservoir.
Answer: true.

True or false:
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.


Baxter
2014-04-18 20:50:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true

http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae

http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72

-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the area is
concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is unproven.

Would you be so opposed to dumping the water if it was shown that offender
had Hepatitus or AIDs?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-18 22:55:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the area is
concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear walks up
and pees...it runs into the water....

So how is that any different?
Baxter
2014-04-18 23:31:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is
unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.

Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
unknown
2014-04-18 23:48:05 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:31:28 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is
unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
Well, tell you the truth, I gotta side with the fascists on this one.
Although they aren't smart enough to know why they think what they do.
but simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
The proportion of contaminants in the water wouldn't even be big
enough to measure in parts per billion and exist anyway in any
municpal water supply. You want pure water you need to get a water
filter or buy bottled water. But the point is taken that it's spring
and there's lots of water to refill it anyway.
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 00:06:40 UTC
Permalink
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts drank
their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No ill effects
were reported.




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Just Wondering
2014-04-19 00:21:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts drank
their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No ill effects
were reported.
Some people (NOT ME, ICK FACTOR!) drink their own unprocessed urine for
ostensible health reasons, with no ill effects. Some people regularly
drink the urine of cows, camels, etc. without harm.

In this case, even though the Portland water may have undergone a
purification process, it almost certainly is less "pure" than people
want to believe. Culinary purification plants just aren't 100%
efficient. If the water was contaminated before entering the plant,
some contamination would still remain after processing. If a dozen
people peed into that reservoir every single day, the Ick Factor would
certainly rear its head, but from a scientific and medical standpoint
the difference probably wouldn't even be measurable, much less hazardous
to anyone's health.
Baxter
2014-04-19 00:39:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts drank
their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No ill effects
were reported.
Some people (NOT ME, ICK FACTOR!) drink their own unprocessed urine for
ostensible health reasons, with no ill effects. Some people regularly
drink the urine of cows, camels, etc. without harm.
But overwhelming most people don't - especially if an alternative, fresh
supply is available.
Post by Just Wondering
In this case, even though the Portland water may have undergone a
purification process, it almost certainly is less "pure" than people
want to believe.
But it's better/purer than most cities water supply
Post by Just Wondering
Culinary purification plants just aren't 100%
efficient. If the water was contaminated before entering the plant,
some contamination would still remain after processing. If a dozen
people peed into that reservoir every single day, the Ick Factor would
certainly rear its head, but from a scientific and medical standpoint
the difference probably wouldn't even be measurable, much less
hazardous
Post by Just Wondering
to anyone's health.
-----------
The urine poses little risk — animals routinely deposit waste without
creating a public health crisis — but Shaff said he doesn’t want to serve
water that was deliberately tainted.

“There is at least a perceived difference from my perspective,” Shaff
said. “I could be wrong on that, but the reality is our customers don’t
anticipate drinking water that’s been contaminated by some yahoo who
decided to pee into a reservoir.”

Shaff says there’s plenty of water coming from the supply at Bull Run,
allowing the bureau to replenish the Mount Tabor reservoir.

“It’s easy to replace those 38 million gallons of water,” Shaff said.
“We’re not in the arid Southwest. We’re not in drought-stricken parts of
Texas or Oklahoma.”

http://tinyurl.com/nlcuxvd

Public health and public water experts say there’s little reason for
Portland to flush Mt. Tabor Reservoir 5 after a man urinated in it
besides the most obvious and least scientific one: The yuck factor.

“Having someone urinate in your water supply is disgusting, but the
reality is, it’s not going to make a difference,” said Richard Luthy, a
professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University.
“There are public health perception issues, but no public health risk.”

“My customers expect that they will receive water that hasn’t been
deliberately contaminated,” Water Bureau administrator David Shaff said
Thursday. “I can do that.”

Dr. Paul Lewis, Multnomah County’s interim health officer, agreed with
the decision.

“The health risk is probably not measureable. That doesn’t mean it’s
zero, but you wouldn’t be able to measure it,” he said. “That said, it
seemed to me that out of the gate they got it right. We’re not worried
about health risks, but we think it’s gross and customers think it’s
gross.”

http://tinyurl.com/maypkxk
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Baxter
2014-04-19 00:21:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts drank
their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No ill
effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however, drink the
urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no idea?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 00:39:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts drank
their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No ill
effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however, drink the
urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Baxter
2014-04-19 01:02:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 16:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
The non-answer means that the dodo again draws a complete blank over
another out-and-out falsehood.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Wayne
2014-04-19 17:43:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.

He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a reservoir is,
and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting water.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
unknown
2014-04-19 17:53:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a reservoir is,
and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting water.
If it were a dry summer and runoff was low it might have been a
different decision. This time of year the northwest has more water
than they know what to do with.
Scout
2014-04-19 18:18:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a reservoir is,
and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting water.
If it were a dry summer and runoff was low it might have been a
different decision. This time of year the northwest has more water
than they know what to do with.
Do they have more money than they know what to do with?
Wayne
2014-04-19 20:27:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a reservoir is,
and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting water.
# If it were a dry summer and runoff was low it might have been a
# different decision. This time of year the northwest has more water
# than they know what to do with.

I visited Portland at the time that the OWS dipshits were living in the
parks.
The Portland folks had no problem with them peeing in the park. Well....at
least for about the first month.
Baxter
2014-04-19 20:34:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
I visited Portland at the time that the OWS dipshits were living in
the parks.
The Portland folks had no problem with them peeing in the park.
Well....at least for about the first month.
OWS was NOT in Mt Tabor park.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Wayne
2014-04-19 20:59:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
I visited Portland at the time that the OWS dipshits were living in
the parks.
The Portland folks had no problem with them peeing in the park.
Well....at least for about the first month.
# OWS was NOT in Mt Tabor park.

Right. But it WAS in downtown with lots of locals who didn't seem to mind.
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 20:49:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
Post by Wayne
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a reservoir is,
and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting water.
# If it were a dry summer and runoff was low it might have been a
# different decision. This time of year the northwest has more water
# than they know what to do with.
I visited Portland at the time that the OWS dipshits were living in the
parks.
The Portland folks had no problem with them peeing in the park.
Well....at least for about the first month.
Also as if no dogs are walked in those parks. But wait, didn't the OP
make an unsubstantiated claim that the reservoirs are kept pristine somehow?
\


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Baxter
2014-04-19 20:32:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a
reservoir is, and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting
water.
If it were a dry summer and runoff was low it might have been a
different decision. This time of year the northwest has more water
than they know what to do with.
It also sends the message that Portland takes water quality seriously and
that deliberate contamination has consequences. For instance, how can
they convict the perp if he could stand before the judge and claim 'no
harm"?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 21:11:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Baxter
Post by Sancho Panza
Simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
An interesting side note is that for a long time U.S. astronauts
drank their own urine. After it had been processed, of course. No
ill effects were reported.
You go right ahead and drink your own urine. Would you, however,
drink the urine of some bum off the street whose health you have no
idea?
Nothing more than another demonstration of total ignorance about the
subject at hand.
# IOW, Sancho admits defeat.
He's just pointing out how insignificant on person peeing in a
reservoir is, and you seem to think it is a big deal worthy of wasting
water.
If it were a dry summer and runoff was low it might have been a
different decision. This time of year the northwest has more water
than they know what to do with.
It also sends the message that Portland takes water quality seriously and
that deliberate contamination has consequences. For instance, how can
they convict the perp if he could stand before the judge and claim 'no
harm"?
There was no harm. All the water tests came back clean.

If the Water Authority chose to dump the water, then it was their choice to
do so, not because of any demonstrable harm by the teen.
Baxter
2014-04-19 00:19:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:31:28 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is
unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
Well, tell you the truth, I gotta side with the fascists on this one.
Although they aren't smart enough to know why they think what they do.
but simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
Nope. The water in the Mt Tabor reservoir has already been treated.
Post by unknown
The proportion of contaminants in the water wouldn't even be big
enough to measure in parts per billion and exist anyway in any
municpal water supply. You want pure water you need to get a water
filter or buy bottled water. But the point is taken that it's spring
and there's lots of water to refill it anyway.
Two things:
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing than
is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because most
animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all day,
(virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like having
your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason to eat
anything but the perfect.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
unknown
2014-04-19 00:45:01 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 00:19:36 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Post by unknown
The proportion of contaminants in the water wouldn't even be big
enough to measure in parts per billion and exist anyway in any
municpal water supply. You want pure water you need to get a water
filter or buy bottled water. But the point is taken that it's spring
and there's lots of water to refill it anyway.
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing than
is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because most
animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all day,
(virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like having
your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason to eat
anything but the perfect.
Even the most beautiful apple has a few specks of bug poop on it.
Baxter
2014-04-19 01:05:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 00:19:36 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Post by unknown
The proportion of contaminants in the water wouldn't even be big
enough to measure in parts per billion and exist anyway in any
municpal water supply. You want pure water you need to get a water
filter or buy bottled water. But the point is taken that it's
spring and there's lots of water to refill it anyway.
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing than
is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because most
animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all day,
(virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like having
your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason to eat
anything but the perfect.
Even the most beautiful apple has a few specks of bug poop on it.
Then you just go ahead wash it off with your pee and then eat it. Do you
also pee in the tub while taking a bath?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 01:33:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by unknown
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:31:28 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim
is
Post by unknown
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
Well, tell you the truth, I gotta side with the fascists on this one.
Although they aren't smart enough to know why they think what they do.
but simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
Nope. The water in the Mt Tabor reservoir has already been treated.
Post by unknown
The proportion of contaminants in the water wouldn't even be big
enough to measure in parts per billion and exist anyway in any
municpal water supply. You want pure water you need to get a water
filter or buy bottled water. But the point is taken that it's spring
and there's lots of water to refill it anyway.
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing than
is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because most
animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
Cite.
Post by Baxter
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all day,
(virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like having
your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason to eat
anything but the perfect.
Money.
Baxter
2014-04-19 04:46:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing than
is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because most
animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
Cite.
To paraphrase your butt-buddies: go look it up yourself
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all day,
(virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like having
your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason to eat
anything but the perfect.
Money.
Negligible.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 17:05:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing than
is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because most
animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
Cite.
To paraphrase your butt-buddies: go look it up yourself
So you've got nothing.
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all day,
(virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like having
your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason to eat
anything but the perfect.
Money.
Negligible.
Sure, nearly $400,000 is negligible.......

If it's so negligible, you won't mind sending me that much, right?
Baxter
2014-04-19 20:30:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing
than is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because
most animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
Cite.
To paraphrase your butt-buddies: go look it up yourself
So you've got nothing.
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all
day, (virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like
having your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason
to eat anything but the perfect.
Money.
Negligible.
Sure, nearly $400,000 is negligible.......
If it's so negligible, you won't mind sending me that much, right?
Don't make up numbers, and don't beleive everything you read - especially
from right-wing sources. I've seen report after report and none of them
put a number anywhere close to $400K. They estimated the incident in
2011 cost $32,700 - I would hardly think this time would cost more and
quite possible a lot less.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 21:09:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
1) Any water source that has human contact requires more processing
than is done for the Portland water supply. This is partly because
most animal diseases are not transmittable to humans.
Cite.
To paraphrase your butt-buddies: go look it up yourself
So you've got nothing.
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
2) Portland has plenty of water. We run the Benson Bubblers all
day, (virtually) every day. Why should we be concerned? It's like
having your choice of apples in a giant orchard - there's no reason
to eat anything but the perfect.
Money.
Negligible.
Sure, nearly $400,000 is negligible.......
If it's so negligible, you won't mind sending me that much, right?
Don't make up numbers, and don't beleive everything you read - especially
from right-wing sources. I've seen report after report and none of them
put a number anywhere close to $400K. They estimated the incident in
2011 cost $32,700 - I would hardly think this time would cost more and
quite possible a lot less.
Hmmm..

In 2011 they dumped 7.5 Million gallons.

This time they are dumping 38 Million gallons.

So right off, I fail to think why you would think it would hardly cost more
and quite possibly a lot less.

7.5 Million vs 38 Million means they are dumping 5 times as much treated
water, but according to Baxter it's quite possible it will cost less than
the 2011 incident.

But running at the cost of 2011...the current cost would be $ 165,680 at
least.

Glad to know that we have free money that just grows on trees.
Scout
2014-04-19 01:31:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:31:28 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is
unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
Well, tell you the truth, I gotta side with the fascists on this one.
Although they aren't smart enough to know why they think what they do.
but simple fact is, urine is sterile. The water will go through a
filtration and purification stage before it reaches comsumers anyway.
The proportion of contaminants in the water wouldn't even be big
enough to measure in parts per billion and exist anyway in any
municpal water supply. You want pure water you need to get a water
filter or buy bottled water. But the point is taken that it's spring
and there's lots of water to refill it anyway.
I doubt that either of those would make any difference. For the purity he
seems to be suggesting the only solution I know of is distillation. Seems a
bit extreme, but hey, it's only money....right?
Scout
2014-04-19 01:29:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim is
unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
The cost and expense of treating the water.....or do you think that happens
for free?
Baxter
2014-04-19 04:44:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim
is unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
The cost and expense of treating the water.....or do you think that
happens for free?
It's small enough that we don't care - after all, we stream this water
out of the Benson Bubblers all day every day.

You seem to think this is a scarce resorce, we disagree.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 17:00:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim
is unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
The cost and expense of treating the water.....or do you think that
happens for free?
It's small enough that we don't care - after all, we stream this water
out of the Benson Bubblers all day every day.
You seem to think this is a scarce resorce, we disagree.
Yea, I do sort of think that money is a scarce resource since no one ever
seems to have enough of it.
Baxter
2014-04-19 20:24:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
You seem to think this is a scarce resorce, we disagree.
Yea, I do sort of think that money is a scarce resource since no one
ever seems to have enough of it.
You rightards have bought into the Capialist Doctrine of Scarcity. That's
how they get you to buy their crap and pay far more than it's actually
worth. There's multiple good reasons to dump that contaminated water, and
no good reason to keep it. There's plenty more water where that came from.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 20:59:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
You seem to think this is a scarce resorce, we disagree.
Yea, I do sort of think that money is a scarce resource since no one
ever seems to have enough of it.
You rightards have bought into the Capialist Doctrine of Scarcity.
Really, so why aren't you a Billionaire?
Post by Baxter
That's
how they get you to buy their crap and pay far more than it's actually
worth. There's multiple good reasons to dump that contaminated water, and
no good reason to keep it. There's plenty more water where that came from.
And according to you endless amounts of money to treat it.

So tell us, if the government has unlimited money...why do we need taxation?
RD Sandman
2014-04-19 16:14:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim
is unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
The cost and expense of treating the water.....or do you think that
happens for free?
He's a progressive liberal so, of course, he does.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 20:57:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into the
reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his claim
is unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a bear
walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any where
near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not be
dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
The cost and expense of treating the water.....or do you think that
happens for free?
He's a progressive liberal so, of course, he does.
Just imagine how it could be sold to droughty California. They could
build a Keystone pipeline for water.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
RD Sandman
2014-04-19 21:44:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
True or false?
The "offender" in the news story did not relieve himself into
the reservoir. Answer: true.
According to reports: false
Post by Just Wondering
The "offender" in the news story contaminated the reservoir.
Answer: false.
According to reports: true
http://tinyurl.com/pzzwdae
http://tinyurl.com/n2sqa72
-HIS- claim is that he didn't actually pee in the water - but the
area is concrete and would run down into the water. And his
claim is unproven.
So if, a dog walks up and pees....it runs into the water. If a
bear walks up and pees...it runs into the water....
So how is that any different?
There's a fence to keep the dogs away, and there's no bears any
where near the reservoirs.
Again, explain why the deliberately contaminated water should not
be dumped - given that Portland has plenty of water to spare?
The cost and expense of treating the water.....or do you think that
happens for free?
He's a progressive liberal so, of course, he does.
Just imagine how it could be sold to droughty California. They could
build a Keystone pipeline for water.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Yep, and then Arizona could get some its water back from the Colorado
Riveer.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
RD Sandman
2014-04-18 20:36:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Hmmmm, makes you wonder. If they can get wild animal piss out of that
water, they certainly could do the same with human piss.
Post by Baxter
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know absolutely
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
Seems you could do the same, Bax.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Baxter
2014-04-18 22:48:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Hmmmm, makes you wonder. If they can get wild animal piss out of that
water, they certainly could do the same with human piss.
Post by Baxter
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know
absolutely
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
Seems you could do the same, Bax.
'Cept you're the one who needs the geography lesson. Ain't no humans nor
reservoirs in Bull Run.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Scout
2014-04-19 01:17:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And
you're
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Hmmmm, makes you wonder. If they can get wild animal piss out of that
water, they certainly could do the same with human piss.
Post by Baxter
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know
absolutely
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
Seems you could do the same, Bax.
'Cept you're the one who needs the geography lesson. Ain't no humans nor
reservoirs in Bull Run.
"The Portland Water Bureau, in cooperation with the Forest Service, offers a
limited number of tours in the Bull Run Watershed. All tours are planned and
guided by a professional Water Resources Educator. Tour participants will
learn about Portland's primary drinking water supply."

http://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/article/384640

Strike ONE!

"The 102 square-mile protected Bull Run watershed collects water from rain
and snowmelt that then flows to the Bull Run River and its tributaries. The
river drains into two reservoirs, where more than 17 billion gallons are
stored."

http://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/29784

Strike TWO!

Looks like Baxter is the one that needs to go back to school.
RD Sandman
2014-04-19 16:10:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And
you're
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Hmmmm, makes you wonder. If they can get wild animal piss out of
that water, they certainly could do the same with human piss.
Post by Baxter
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know
absolutely
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
Seems you could do the same, Bax.
'Cept you're the one who needs the geography lesson. Ain't no humans
nor reservoirs in Bull Run.
"The Portland Water Bureau, in cooperation with the Forest Service,
offers a limited number of tours in the Bull Run Watershed. All tours
are planned and guided by a professional Water Resources Educator.
Tour participants will learn about Portland's primary drinking water
supply."
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/article/384640
Strike ONE!
"The 102 square-mile protected Bull Run watershed collects water from
rain and snowmelt that then flows to the Bull Run River and its
tributaries. The river drains into two reservoirs, where more than 17
billion gallons are stored."
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/water/29784
Strike TWO!
Looks like Baxter is the one that needs to go back to school.
Yep. In the pictures he referenced of Bull Run, I didn't see any fences
or structures to keep people or animals out.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
RD Sandman
2014-04-19 16:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And
you're
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Hmmmm, makes you wonder. If they can get wild animal piss out of
that water, they certainly could do the same with human piss.
Post by Baxter
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know
absolutely
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.
Seems you could do the same, Bax.
'Cept you're the one who needs the geography lesson. Ain't no humans
nor reservoirs in Bull Run.
And you know this how? C'mon, you mental dwarf, be specific how you know
that there have been no humans in Bull Run.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
RogerGlover
2014-04-18 20:44:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And you're
not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.

Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know absolutely
nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research first.

####
Why does is get "Treated" after the "bull run" ( like I TAUGHT YOU ABOUT),
VS. not being "treated in the reservoir?

STOP POSTING! Yer a retard
Baxter
2014-04-18 22:54:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
The water is treated *before* it goes into the reservoir. And
you're not allowed in the Bull Run Watershed.
So where are the signs warning birds that it's a no-fly zone?
Water gets treated AFTER Bull Run Watershed.
Damn, you retards shouldn't be yapping about things you know
absolutely nothing about. If you're going to yap, do a little research
first.
####
Why does is get "Treated" after the "bull run" ( like I TAUGHT YOU
ABOUT), VS. not being "treated in the reservoir?
STOP POSTING! Yer a retard
You're the one who needs to stop posting. Rightard.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
RogerGlover
2014-04-18 19:53:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Mr. B1ack
PORTLAND, Ore. — The mix of 38 million gallons of treated water
and one teen’s urine has proven unacceptable to Portland
officials who plan to flush away the whole lot — the second time
in less than three years the city has gone to such lengths to
keep its water pure.
Wow ! Who knew a penis was such a dangerous
terror weapon !!!
I don't suppose anyone's interested in how many
bears - and beavers and fish and whatever - piss
into that water every day ......... :-)
None. No bears, no beaver on Mt Tabor. No fish in reservoir - it's
concrete lined.
#####
No birds either, you assume?
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not inviting to
any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as much chorine.)


######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."

Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the reservoir
is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete it'self is holding
schmutch!

I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would be
rather rhetorical.
Baxter
2014-04-18 20:33:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
RD Sandman
2014-04-18 20:43:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Other than an inability to clean it? If you think one person pissing
into that revervoir pollutes it......do NOT....I repeat, do NOT.....even
think about swimming in a municipal pool or your neighbor's.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Baxter
2014-04-18 22:53:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Other than an inability to clean it? If you think one person pissing
into that revervoir pollutes it......do NOT....I repeat, do
NOT.....even
Post by RD Sandman
think about swimming in a municipal pool or your neighbor's.
They empty and clean the reservoir all the time. They'll probably use
this incident as an excuse to do exactly that. And it's not like they
can turn off the Bull Run river that supplies (the treatment facility
and) the reservoir. That water is headed to the ocean regardless.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
RogerGlover
2014-04-19 15:29:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Other than an inability to clean it? If you think one person pissing
into that revervoir pollutes it......do NOT....I repeat, do NOT.....even
think about swimming in a municipal pool or your neighbor's.

####
I can't believe that he posted a link to a picture that CLEARLY SHOWED not
only the Vegetation, but the downward slope INTO the reservoir!
EGAD! Look at the FUNGUS/Mold that is on the Concrete!

Baxter is about as insane as DooDoo!
Baxter
2014-04-19 16:02:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard deliberately polluted water.
Other than an inability to clean it? If you think one person pissing
into that revervoir pollutes it......do NOT....I repeat, do
NOT.....even think about swimming in a municipal pool or your
neighbor's.
####
I can't believe that he posted a link to a picture that CLEARLY SHOWED
not only the Vegetation, but the downward slope INTO the reservoir!
EGAD! Look at the FUNGUS/Mold that is on the Concrete!
Baxter is about as insane as DooDoo!
Ten-to-one you're actually talking about someone else's link. That's
another common trick of righards - taking things out of context, making
claims about things long past.

Did you mean this one? http://tinyurl.com/klc8sbu
Where's the "vegetation" and "downward slope into the reservoir"?
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Just Wondering
2014-04-18 22:33:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Since you fee that way, I strongly advise you never to enter a public
swimming pool, or drink from a public fountain, or use a public restroom.
Baxter
2014-04-18 23:05:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Since you fee that way, I strongly advise you never to enter a public
swimming pool, or drink from a public fountain, or use a public restroom.
Your logic broke its legs - perhaps you need to put it out of its misery.

And BTW: http://tinyurl.com/k3u99wr
Note that they run continuously - there is no valve.
See also: http://www.uniquely-portland-oregon.com/benson-bubblers.html
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Just Wondering
2014-04-18 23:52:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kike
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Since you fee that way, I strongly advise you never to enter a public
swimming pool, or drink from a public fountain, or use a public
restroom.
Your logic broke its legs ...
My logic is just fine. Public swimming pools, drinking fountains, and
restrooms are all FAR more contaminated by human contact than a single
person taking a leak fifty feet away from a reservoir could POSSIBLY
contaminate millions of gallons of water.
RD Sandman
2014-04-19 16:05:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kike
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Since you fee that way, I strongly advise you never to enter a public
swimming pool, or drink from a public fountain, or use a public
restroom.
Your logic broke its legs - perhaps you need to put it out of its misery.
No, he didn't. You simply didn't think it through.
Post by Kike
And BTW: http://tinyurl.com/k3u99wr
Note that they run continuously - there is no valve.
See also: http://www.uniquely-portland-oregon.com/benson-bubblers.html
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

One bullet in the possession of a criminal is too many.....
Ten bullets in the possession of a mother trying to protect
her children....may not be enough.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Scout
2014-04-18 23:01:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.

I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
Baxter
2014-04-18 23:33:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal. The water is pure from the source. The PR is
worth the "cost".
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 00:08:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kike
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal. The water is pure from the source. The PR is
worth the "cost".
If "the water is pure from the source," then there is no reason in the
world for it to be treated before and after passing through the reservoirs.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Harold Burton
2014-04-19 01:32:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Kike
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal. The water is pure from the source. The PR is
worth the "cost".
If "the water is pure from the source," then there is no reason in the
world for it to be treated before and after passing through the reservoirs.
there ya go confusin the idiot Baxter with logic. :-)


Leftards, batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of
them.
2,375 murdered in Obama's organized communities
2014-04-19 07:56:02 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:32:00 -0400, Harold Burton
Post by Harold Burton
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Kike
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal. The water is pure from the source. The PR is
worth the "cost".
If "the water is pure from the source," then there is no reason in the
world for it to be treated before and after passing through the reservoirs.
there ya go confusin the idiot Baxter with logic. :-)
It's ~organic~ water.
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 16:27:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by 2,375 murdered in Obama's organized communities
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:32:00 -0400, Harold Burton
Post by Harold Burton
Post by Sancho Panza
Post by Kike
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal. The water is pure from the source. The PR is
worth the "cost".
If "the water is pure from the source," then there is no reason in the
world for it to be treated before and after passing through the reservoirs.
there ya go confusin the idiot Baxter with logic. :-)
It's ~organic~ water.
If it is treated, it cannot be labeled "organic." Enough already with
contorting the language.




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Harold Burton
2014-04-19 01:30:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kike
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal. The water is pure from the source.
Hahahahahaahahahaha. NO water is pure from the source.


Leftards, batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.
Scout
2014-04-19 01:35:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kike
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to
discard
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
deliberately polluted water.
Expense.
I suppose you think that water treatment is free?
The treatment is minimal.
I'm sure you think so.
Post by Kike
The water is pure from the source.
Then why would it have to be treated?

You can't have it both ways.
Post by Kike
The PR is
worth the "cost".
Says you.
Baxter
2014-04-19 04:47:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
The treatment is minimal.
I'm sure you think so.
Post by Baxter
The water is pure from the source.
Then why would it have to be treated?
You can't have it both ways.
Preventive. There's probably more pathogens in the house pipes than in the
water that comes from Bull Run.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 16:26:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
The treatment is minimal.
I'm sure you think so.
Post by Baxter
The water is pure from the source.
Then why would it have to be treated?
You can't have it both ways.
Preventive. There's probably more pathogens in the house pipes than in the
water that comes from Bull Run.
What is in those pipes comes from the water source mentioned. Another
concept too difficult for the poster to comprehend.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Scout
2014-04-19 17:05:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Scout
Post by Baxter
The treatment is minimal.
I'm sure you think so.
Post by Baxter
The water is pure from the source.
Then why would it have to be treated?
You can't have it both ways.
Preventive. There's probably more pathogens in the house pipes than in the
water that comes from Bull Run.
Smells like more of Baxter's Bullshit made up on the spot.
RogerGlover
2014-04-19 15:12:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.

#####
No "pollution", you mental muffin-head.
Even if that happened, we are talking "Parts Per Quadrillion."

Ever have oral sex with your wife(if you have one, that is)?

Oh, I guess not, considering your kind.
Baxter
2014-04-19 15:36:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
#####
No "pollution", you mental muffin-head.
Yes, deliberate contamination.
Post by Baxter
Even if that happened, we are talking "Parts Per Quadrillion."
Don't care. The risk might be infinitesimal, but it is not zero. And it's
good PR to show the people of Portland that you're proactive in
protecting their water supply - especially when the cost is minimal.
Post by Baxter
Ever have oral sex with your wife(if you have one, that is)?
Oh, I guess not, considering your kind.
One can always tell when rightards have lost the debate - they invariably
turn to personal attacks.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
RogerGlover
2014-04-19 16:12:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by Baxter
Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there. Not
inviting to any animal life. Think swimming pool (but not quite as
much chorine.)
######
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!
"Few birds - no vegetation, no reason for them to be there."
Boy-O-Hardy! You are truly a 5-star General Retard!
The PICTURE that you provided via the cite, showed CLEARY that the
reservoir is indeed SURROUNDED by vegetation , as the concrete
it'self is holding schmutch!
I would ask if you possibly could be a bigger retard, but that would
be rather rhetorical.
What you retards are ignoring is that there is no reason NOT to discard
deliberately polluted water.
#####
No "pollution", you mental muffin-head.
Yes, deliberate contamination.
Post by Baxter
Even if that happened, we are talking "Parts Per Quadrillion."
Don't care. The risk might be infinitesimal, but it is not zero. And it's
good PR to show the people of Portland that you're proactive in
protecting their water supply - especially when the cost is minimal.
Post by Baxter
Ever have oral sex with your wife(if you have one, that is)?
Oh, I guess not, considering your kind.
One can always tell when rightards have lost the debate - they invariably
turn to personal attacks.


####
I WON the debate, you retard!
I DIVED RIGHT INTO IT!
YOU won't admit that you occasionally "eat out" at the wife's "Y" .... IF
you have one?

Do you eat FISH?
Guess what FISH EAT and do in the water you DRINK, you retard.

Oh wait!
Fish is brain food.
No WONDER yer a stump-stupid retard!
Sancho Panza
2014-04-19 16:29:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Post by RogerGlover
Even if that happened, we are talking "Parts Per Quadrillion."
Don't care. The risk might be infinitesimal, but it is not zero.
Reality and sense of proportions never matter for radical ideologues.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
Loading...