useapen
2024-04-24 09:00:22 UTC
Arizona rancher George Alan Kellys defense confirmed to Fox News Digital
that there was "one, lone holdout" who wanted to convict, while the
remaining jurors sought an acquittal.
Arizona Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink declared that the case ended in a
mistrial on Monday, as the jurors were unable to reach a unanimous
decision to convict Kelly of second-degree murder or any of the lower
counts of manslaughter, negligent homicide or aggravated assault with a
deadly weapon. Fink scheduled a 1:30 p.m. status hearing for Monday, April
29.
Fink said that the hearing next week will "allow the state to take a look
at the situation and decide whether or not it wishes to ask the court to
reset the matter for trial."
"The jury verdict was seven to acquit and one, lone holdout who was
stubborn and would not listen to evidence," the defense team told Fox News
Digital. "All the other jurors were angry about it."
The jury remained deadlocked after deliberating since Thursday for more
than 15 hours.
"They won't wear me down," Kelly said at the courthouse of the potential
of being tried a second time, according to AZ Central.
"I feel like I've been in suspension for 15 months, and I'm getting
nowhere, and I'm still on that treadmill. We have to wait a little
longer," Kelly's wife, Wanda Kelly, added Monday, according to the outlet.
Fox News Digital reached out to Santa Cruz County District Attorney George
Silva's office on Tuesday but did not immediately hear back.
Kellys defense attorney, Brenna Larkin, said in her closing argument last
week that evidence did not support the prosecutions claim that the
deceased, Mexican national Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, was an "unarmed migrant
pursuing the American Dream" before he was found shot to death on Kelly's
170-acre cattle ranch near Keno Springs outside Nogales, Arizona, on Jan.
30, 2023.
The defense claimed that prosecutors failed to prove that Cuen-Buitimea
was shot by Kelly's gun. The defense maintained that Kelly only fired
warning shots into the air from his patio earlier that day, and Wanda
Kelly testified about dialing their Border Patrol ranch liaison upon
spotting two armed men dressed in camouflage and carrying rifles and
backpacks walking about 100 feet from their home. Law enforcement
responded to the property, and hours passed before Kelly called Border
Patrol again to report finding the body about 115 yards from the ranching
couple's residence.
A criminologist working pro bono as a consultant for Kellys defense, Dr.
Ron Martinelli, excoriated Santa Cruz County Sheriff David Hathaway's
testimony about having crossed the border to Mexico weeks after the
shooting on Kelly's ranch to interview Daniel Ramirez, a Honduran man who
prosecutors claim was the sole sight witness to Cuen-Buitimea's death.
Larkin said, based on Ramirez's own testimony, he was not there.
Ramirez testified that he formerly ran drugs across the border, though not
on the day of the shooting, and had been deported several times.
Additionally, the defense argued the investigation was mired by cartel
influence.
Hathaway, who only recorded about six minutes of a 40-minute interview
with Ramirez, was pressed about a conduit who arranged the meeting in
Mexico named Juan Carlos Rodriguez.
Martinelli told Fox News Digital that the district attorney's office was
forced to reveal to the defense team that Rodriguez is a twice convicted
felon the first for aggravated assault and domestic violence after
strangling his girlfriend, and then he served another two years in prison
"for the transportation of weapons into the United States."
"The Sinaloa Cartel and Malas Manos do not allow independent people to
bring guns, traffic guns into the United States," Martinelli told Fox News
Digital last week, while the jury was still deliberating.
ARIZONA RANCHER GEORGE ALAN KELLY'S WIFE TESTIFIES IN MURDER TRIAL,
DESCRIBES ARMED MEN NEAR BORDERLANDS HOME
"To me, [Hathaway] absolutely conceded to violating Mexican law and United
States State Department protocols with regards to conducting an
international investigation in Mexico," Martinelli said, referencing the
sheriff's testimony. "His whole statement and justification that he went
down to Mexico to quote, 'offer his condolences to the family' is beyond
belief. You know, are we to assume that that's his M.O. every time a
Mexican national dies in a violent crime in Nogales that he personally
takes it upon himself to go down to a foreign country to express his
condolences? I mean, that's beyond the pale."
Martinelli further took issue with the sheriff's department and the
district attorney's investigator. "Once they knew who these people were,
well into this investigation, months and months ago, they continued to
believe these people over two American citizens, who were law-abiding and
cooperative," the consultant added.
The defense also pressed Hathaway on the stand about a YouTube video in
which the sheriff referenced the Kelly case and claimed that the rancher
wanted to "hunt me some Mexicans."
"Just after hearing the sheriff and seeing the video, to us, the sheriff
was the moving force behind the arrest and continued prosecution of George
Alan Kelly. And I believe, this is my opinion, I believe that it was to
further his political designs for re-election as sheriff," Martinelli said
last week, vowing to bring a personal complaint to the state's attorney
general's office seeking an investigation into Hathaway and the sheriff's
department regardless of the outcome of the case. "Because if this was the
United States Department of Justice, and we had such a grievous civil
rights violations, DOJ would be on and the FBI would be on top of this in
a heartbeat, and they would be looking towards what we refer to as a
consent decree against this agency. This is just crazy. These people
should not be having badges of authority."
Fox News Digital reached out to the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department
about the defense consultant's allegations again on Tuesday but did not
immediately hear back.
"We're not here to solve the mystery," Larkin said Thursday. "And the fact
is, we're probably never going to know what really happened to Gabriel.
And we won't know because the investigation in this case jumped to
conclusions. They didn't search when they should have. They didn't
preserve evidence that they should have. They didn't do tests that they
should have. And now we'll never know."
"We all live in Santa Cruz County. I live in Santa Cruz County. You folks
live in Santa Cruz County," Larkin said. "After reviewing all the evidence
in this case, if I were to imagine finding a body on my property someday,
hopefully that never happens. If I ever find a body on my property
someday, and I don't know what happened, and I don't know how it got
there, I think I'd be considering my options before I call these guys."
Testimony also revealed that the fatal bullet was never recovered from the
scene. Martinelli also previously told Fox News Digital that none of the
states witnesses in the trial had provided any rebuttal testimony against
the defense theory that a rip crew a gang of bandits, sometimes cartel-
affiliated could have fatally shot Cuen-Buitimea and robbed him.
Prosecutor Mike Jette maintained in his closing argument that there was
"no justification" to use deadly physical force upon seeing "two unarmed
men walking two fences away" and claimed Kelly pulled out his AK-47,
stepped out onto his back patio and, without any verbal warning, fired
nine times. The defense said while Kelly would have been justified in
using deadly physical force, the elderly rancher did not.
Larkin added that there is nothing in the law that prevents him from using
lesser force to defend himself and his wife out on their isolated ranch
"in the middle of nowhere."
https://www.foxnews.com/us/arizona-rancher-george-alan-kellys-defense-
says-lone-hold-out-juror-blocked-acquittal-state-weighs-2nd-trial
that there was "one, lone holdout" who wanted to convict, while the
remaining jurors sought an acquittal.
Arizona Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink declared that the case ended in a
mistrial on Monday, as the jurors were unable to reach a unanimous
decision to convict Kelly of second-degree murder or any of the lower
counts of manslaughter, negligent homicide or aggravated assault with a
deadly weapon. Fink scheduled a 1:30 p.m. status hearing for Monday, April
29.
Fink said that the hearing next week will "allow the state to take a look
at the situation and decide whether or not it wishes to ask the court to
reset the matter for trial."
"The jury verdict was seven to acquit and one, lone holdout who was
stubborn and would not listen to evidence," the defense team told Fox News
Digital. "All the other jurors were angry about it."
The jury remained deadlocked after deliberating since Thursday for more
than 15 hours.
"They won't wear me down," Kelly said at the courthouse of the potential
of being tried a second time, according to AZ Central.
"I feel like I've been in suspension for 15 months, and I'm getting
nowhere, and I'm still on that treadmill. We have to wait a little
longer," Kelly's wife, Wanda Kelly, added Monday, according to the outlet.
Fox News Digital reached out to Santa Cruz County District Attorney George
Silva's office on Tuesday but did not immediately hear back.
Kellys defense attorney, Brenna Larkin, said in her closing argument last
week that evidence did not support the prosecutions claim that the
deceased, Mexican national Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, was an "unarmed migrant
pursuing the American Dream" before he was found shot to death on Kelly's
170-acre cattle ranch near Keno Springs outside Nogales, Arizona, on Jan.
30, 2023.
The defense claimed that prosecutors failed to prove that Cuen-Buitimea
was shot by Kelly's gun. The defense maintained that Kelly only fired
warning shots into the air from his patio earlier that day, and Wanda
Kelly testified about dialing their Border Patrol ranch liaison upon
spotting two armed men dressed in camouflage and carrying rifles and
backpacks walking about 100 feet from their home. Law enforcement
responded to the property, and hours passed before Kelly called Border
Patrol again to report finding the body about 115 yards from the ranching
couple's residence.
A criminologist working pro bono as a consultant for Kellys defense, Dr.
Ron Martinelli, excoriated Santa Cruz County Sheriff David Hathaway's
testimony about having crossed the border to Mexico weeks after the
shooting on Kelly's ranch to interview Daniel Ramirez, a Honduran man who
prosecutors claim was the sole sight witness to Cuen-Buitimea's death.
Larkin said, based on Ramirez's own testimony, he was not there.
Ramirez testified that he formerly ran drugs across the border, though not
on the day of the shooting, and had been deported several times.
Additionally, the defense argued the investigation was mired by cartel
influence.
Hathaway, who only recorded about six minutes of a 40-minute interview
with Ramirez, was pressed about a conduit who arranged the meeting in
Mexico named Juan Carlos Rodriguez.
Martinelli told Fox News Digital that the district attorney's office was
forced to reveal to the defense team that Rodriguez is a twice convicted
felon the first for aggravated assault and domestic violence after
strangling his girlfriend, and then he served another two years in prison
"for the transportation of weapons into the United States."
"The Sinaloa Cartel and Malas Manos do not allow independent people to
bring guns, traffic guns into the United States," Martinelli told Fox News
Digital last week, while the jury was still deliberating.
ARIZONA RANCHER GEORGE ALAN KELLY'S WIFE TESTIFIES IN MURDER TRIAL,
DESCRIBES ARMED MEN NEAR BORDERLANDS HOME
"To me, [Hathaway] absolutely conceded to violating Mexican law and United
States State Department protocols with regards to conducting an
international investigation in Mexico," Martinelli said, referencing the
sheriff's testimony. "His whole statement and justification that he went
down to Mexico to quote, 'offer his condolences to the family' is beyond
belief. You know, are we to assume that that's his M.O. every time a
Mexican national dies in a violent crime in Nogales that he personally
takes it upon himself to go down to a foreign country to express his
condolences? I mean, that's beyond the pale."
Martinelli further took issue with the sheriff's department and the
district attorney's investigator. "Once they knew who these people were,
well into this investigation, months and months ago, they continued to
believe these people over two American citizens, who were law-abiding and
cooperative," the consultant added.
The defense also pressed Hathaway on the stand about a YouTube video in
which the sheriff referenced the Kelly case and claimed that the rancher
wanted to "hunt me some Mexicans."
"Just after hearing the sheriff and seeing the video, to us, the sheriff
was the moving force behind the arrest and continued prosecution of George
Alan Kelly. And I believe, this is my opinion, I believe that it was to
further his political designs for re-election as sheriff," Martinelli said
last week, vowing to bring a personal complaint to the state's attorney
general's office seeking an investigation into Hathaway and the sheriff's
department regardless of the outcome of the case. "Because if this was the
United States Department of Justice, and we had such a grievous civil
rights violations, DOJ would be on and the FBI would be on top of this in
a heartbeat, and they would be looking towards what we refer to as a
consent decree against this agency. This is just crazy. These people
should not be having badges of authority."
Fox News Digital reached out to the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department
about the defense consultant's allegations again on Tuesday but did not
immediately hear back.
"We're not here to solve the mystery," Larkin said Thursday. "And the fact
is, we're probably never going to know what really happened to Gabriel.
And we won't know because the investigation in this case jumped to
conclusions. They didn't search when they should have. They didn't
preserve evidence that they should have. They didn't do tests that they
should have. And now we'll never know."
"We all live in Santa Cruz County. I live in Santa Cruz County. You folks
live in Santa Cruz County," Larkin said. "After reviewing all the evidence
in this case, if I were to imagine finding a body on my property someday,
hopefully that never happens. If I ever find a body on my property
someday, and I don't know what happened, and I don't know how it got
there, I think I'd be considering my options before I call these guys."
Testimony also revealed that the fatal bullet was never recovered from the
scene. Martinelli also previously told Fox News Digital that none of the
states witnesses in the trial had provided any rebuttal testimony against
the defense theory that a rip crew a gang of bandits, sometimes cartel-
affiliated could have fatally shot Cuen-Buitimea and robbed him.
Prosecutor Mike Jette maintained in his closing argument that there was
"no justification" to use deadly physical force upon seeing "two unarmed
men walking two fences away" and claimed Kelly pulled out his AK-47,
stepped out onto his back patio and, without any verbal warning, fired
nine times. The defense said while Kelly would have been justified in
using deadly physical force, the elderly rancher did not.
Larkin added that there is nothing in the law that prevents him from using
lesser force to defend himself and his wife out on their isolated ranch
"in the middle of nowhere."
https://www.foxnews.com/us/arizona-rancher-george-alan-kellys-defense-
says-lone-hold-out-juror-blocked-acquittal-state-weighs-2nd-trial